141 Ill. App. 3d 839 - People v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2013
4 federal appellate · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 104 Ill. 2d 504 - People v. Albanese · 52 Ill. 2d 374 - People v. Clark · 79 Ill. 2d 103 - People v. Greer · 67 Ill. 2d 449 - People v. Lawson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he decision of the severity of the sanction to impose on a party who violates discovery rules rests within the sound discretion of the trial court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the trial court abused its discretion by excluding the testimony of a defense witness as a sanction for violation of the discovery rules.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Taylor v. Illinois“discovery rules are violated, the trial judge may exclude the evidence which the violating party wishes to introduce”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Taylor v. Illinois
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.