Flanagan v. Lux’s Empirical Analysis
1935
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1957
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. National Refining Co. · Williams v. Cities Service Gas Co. · Norman v. Consolidated Cement Co. · Honn v. Elliott · Lenon v. Standard Oil Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It has been, held that there is no necessity for the making of a second written claim after one has been made fully complying with this requirement, if the action is commenced within a reasonable time. (Lenon v. Standard Oil Co., 134 Kan. 289 , 5 P. 2d 853 .) So that if either one of these two efforts fully met the requirements of the law as to making and serving claims, the claimant would be entitled to maintain compensation proceedings.” (p. 99.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The injured party is generally referred to in the compensation act as the claimant, and, as the word indicates, he is naturally the one expected to make the claim, although that part of the statute above quoted does not so state, but in the concluding part of said section it is specifically stated that if the claimant has been under disability, the time shall not begin to run until the removal of such disability.” (p. 91.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““As stated above, this second claim only needs to be considered because we concluded, as the trial court did, that the first written claim was not such as was required by statute.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.