Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 Md. App. 354 - Ratchford v. State

141 Md. App. 354 - Ratchford v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2020

21 state decisions

140200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Colorado v. Spring · 87 Md. App. 57 - Howell v. State · 89 Md. App. 178 - Alston v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As one of the four factors on the ultimate merits, it is heavily influenced by the other three factors, particularly that of “reasons for the delay.” It may gain weight or it may lose weight because of circumstances that have nothing to do with the mere ticking of the clock.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Length of delay" in one of its manifestations , moreover, is by no means the equivalent of "length of delay" in its other manifestation. For its procedural function, "length of delay" is the gross period of time between the arrest and the trial or the hearing on the motion. For its function as a factor on the merits , by contrast, the "length of delay" is the net period of time that may be chargeable to the State or to the court system as true "delay," some of which, depending on other circumstances, may be given great weight and some of which may be given only slight weight.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “between arrest and trial is a term of art that serves two separate and distinct functions in a speedy trial analysis. In its first function, it identifies the threshold that must be crossed before any further analysis is called for. Along the delay continuum, the trigger of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.