Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 Md. App. 517 - Grant v. State

141 Md. App. 517 - Grant v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 2014

4 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

10020012010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Katz v. United States · Payton v. New York · Mincey v. Arizona · Florida v. Jimeno

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e believe the legislative intent is made manifest by the words of the statute, and particularly the definition of “manufacture” found in § 277(p). This statutory definition does not include the packaging or repackaging of any controlled dangerous substance. It includes only packaging or repackaging of controlled dangerous substances that have been manufactured in the manner described by the legislature. The language of § 277(p) concerning “packaging or repackaging of the substance or labeling or relabeling of its containers” refers back to the controlled dangerous substance that is produced by extraction or by means of chemical synthesis, or by both means. The obvious legislative intent was to include packaging and labeling within the definition of “manufacture” when that packaging or labeling is in conjunction with a true manufacturing process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.