Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 ME 194 - State v. McKrackern

State v. McKrackern’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
states following
May 1984
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently May 1984 · most notably State v. Bey (1965), State v. O'Clair (1972)

3 federal appellate · 2 district · 44 state decisions

26019451950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Estate of Barber

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In this state there is no statute or rule of court requiring the presiding justice, on motion, to segregate the witnesses during the trial. Whether or not the witnesses should be segregated in a given case, rests in the sound discretion of the court, to whose ruling an exception will not lie unless it appears that there has been an abuse of discretion.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.