Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 MINN 27 - Morris v. Wulke

Morris v. Wulke’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 1958
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stevens v. City of Minneapolis · Olson v. Gjertsen · Lamoreaux v. Weisman · Aldrich v. Grand Rapids Cycle Co. · Leonard v. Rosendahl

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There are no facts to take this case out of the general rule. In fact the wide divergence of opinion among the experts themselves in their estimates of value in this case is such as to demonstrate the inconclusive character of their testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the opinion of experts as to the value of services, even though not directly contradicted, is not in ordinary cases conclusive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.