Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 MOAPP 694 - State v. Sexton

State v. Sexton’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
December 1958
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1958

7 state decisions

5019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Briggs v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. · State ex rel. Weber v. Tucker · Latshaw v. McNees · 110 Mo. App. 561 - Shaw v. St. Louis, Memphis & Southeastern Railway Co. · McCarg v. . Burr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is a general rule that, inasmuch as the justice of the peace has only such jurisdiction as the statute confers upon him the facts giving such jurisdiction must affirmatively appear on the face of the proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.