Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 N.C. App. 115 - State v. Peoples

141 N.C. App. 115 - State v. Peoples’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

30 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Gordon · State v. White · State v. Hill · State v. McMorris · State v. James

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is proper for defendant to advise the jury of the possible consequence of imprisonment following conviction to encourage the jury to give the matter its close attention and to decide it only after due and careful consideration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “whether there is a reasonable possibility that a different result would have been reached by the jury had the error in question not been committed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “each offense requires proof of at least one element that the other does not.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.