Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 N.C. App. 262 - Prince v. Wright

141 N.C. App. 262 - Prince v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
1
states following
December 2022
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently December 2022 · most notably 144 N.C. App. 623 - Sessler v. Marsh (2001), 146 N.C. App. 483 - Durling v. King (2001)

27 state decisions

250200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance · Collingwood v. GEN. ELEC. R. EST. EQUIT. · Nelson v. Freeland · 120 N.C. App. 650 - Pleasant Valley Promenade v. Lechmere, Inc. · 41 N.C. App. 661 - Davidson & Jones, Inc. v. County of New Hanover

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[c]ommerce in its broadest sense comprehends intercourse for the purpose of trade in any form.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[while] a plaintiff generally cannot sue the insurance company of an adverse party under G.S. § 75-1.1, if the plaintiff achieves the status of an intended third-party beneficiary arising from the contractual relationship between the adverse party and the adverse party's insurance company, the plaintiff may then bring a claim against the insurance company for violating the unfair and deceptive practices statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[the insurer] may have created for itself a duty to plaintiff which it breached by first expressly undertaking to conduct an inspection of the suitability of the house for residential purposes and then by failing to warn tenants of the dangerous conditions it discovered during that inspection.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.