Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 N.C. App. 507 - Webb v. Power Circuit, Inc.

141 N.C. App. 507 - Webb v. Power Circuit, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Deese v. Champion International Corp. · 108 N.C. App. 762 - Russell v. Lowes Product Distribution · Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. · 123 N.C. App. 200 - Franklin v. Broyhill Furniture Industries · 108 N.C. App. 259 - Matthews v. Petroleum Tank Service, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the production of medical evidence that he is physically or mentally, as a consequence of the work related injury, incapable of work in any employment; (2) the production of evidence that he is capable of some work, but that he has, after a reasonable effort on his part, been unsuccessful in his effort to obtain employment; (3) the production of evidence that he is capable of some work but that it would be futile because of preexisting conditions, i.e., age, inexperience, lack of education, to seek other employment; or (4) the production of evidence that he has obtained other employment at a wage less than that earned prior to the injury.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]n determining if plaintiff has met this burden, the Commission must consider not only the plaintiff's physical limitations, but also his testimony as to his pain in determining the extent of incapacity to work and earn wages such pain might cause.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[o]nce the employee has shown a disability, the burden then shifts to the employer to produce evidence that suitable jobs are available for the employee and that the employee is capable of getting one, taking the employee's physical and vocational limitations into account.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.