State v. JADE G.’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 district · 65 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably State Ex Rel. Children, Youth & Families Department v. Benjamin O. (2007), 1 N.M. Ct. App. 673 - State v. Arrendondo (2012)
2 district · 65 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gault · Department of Revenue of Ore. v. ACF Industries, Inc. · State v. Attaway · State v. Rowell · Key v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when the Legislature includes a particular word in one portion of a statute and omits it from another portion of that statute, such omission is presumed to be intentional.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“that as a general rule, propositions of law not raised in the trial court cannot be considered sua sponte by the appellate court”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lewis“will not read into a statute ... language which is not there, particularly if it makes sense as written”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.