Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 N.M. 392 - State v. Harbison

State v. Harbison’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
3
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

2 district · 45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably State v. Neal (2007), State v. Garcia (2009)

2 district · 45 state decisions

260200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Wong Sun v. United States · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Sokolow · Illinois v. Wardlow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The point at which the seizure occurs is pivotal because it determines the point in time the police must have reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “test articulated in Mendenhall provides the standard for determining whether a person is seized for purposes of Article II, Section 10 of the New Mexico Constitution. We decide this appeal on state constitutional grounds, applying the Mendenhall”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a person is seized within the meaning of the [F]ourth [A]mendment when, in view of all the circumstances surrounding the incident, a reasonable person would have believed he was not free to leave.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.