Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 Ohio App. 3d 144 - State v. Bailey

141 Ohio App. 3d 144 - State v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2021

10 state decisions

60200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Singer · 13 Ohio App. 3d 27 - State v. Geraldo · 129 Ohio App. 3d 294 - State v. Hirsch · 79 Ohio App. 3d 705 - State v. Howard · State v. Palmer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We have also noted that `[i]t is reasonably clear that the legislature has determined that the speedy trial clock begins to run with either an arrest or its functional equivalent.' State v. Brock (May 22, 1991), Montgomery App. No. 12227, unreported, 1991 WL 96313 . And in State v. Lloyd (Mar. 31, 1999), Montgomery App. No. 15927, unreported, 1999 WL 173017 , we observed that issuing a detainer against an accused who has already been arrested on another charge has the same effect as if the individual had been arrested and confined on the charge that precipitated the detainer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]n the trial court, the burden to show that more than two hundred seventy days ha[s] elapsed since his arrest [is] on [the defendant], and that burden implicitly carries with it the obligation to establish the day upon which he was arrested for purposes of the speedy trial statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.