141 Ohio App. 3d 626 - State v. Roberson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

17 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[i]n the specific context of a defense counsel's failure to advise a defendant of the immigration consequences of a guilty plea, the United States Supreme Court has held that a defendant demonstrates prejudice by 'convinc[ing] the court that a decision to reject the plea bargain would have been rational under the circumstances.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Taveras

2. “The sentencing court shall consider all of the following that apply regarding the offender, the offense, or the victim, and any other relevant factors, as indicating that the offender's conduct is less serious than conduct normally constituting the offense: {¶ 94}”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Nichols, Unpublished Decision (6-9-2006)

3. “* * * the Gardner holding requiring full disclosure applies only to death penalty cases where rehabilitation is no longer an issue.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Bond, Unpublished Decision (2-3-2006)