Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 Okla. 207 - Green v. Struble

Green v. Struble’s Empirical Analysis

1930

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 1936
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bale v. Wright · Swearingen v. Moore · Brouse v. Cox

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We do not wish to be understood as holding that the mere placing of the notes or coupons by plaintiff with Bobinson, Catlin, Mulford & Smith, for collection, would authorize that firm to employ a subagent for the purpose of collecting same, but when she clothed them with authority to handle her business generally in such way as they saw best, and to use such methods as they chose, then if reasonable necessity arose for the appointment of a subagent, authority was implied to appoint such subagent.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““The payment of negotiable promissory note before maturity by the mortgagor or his grantee, when made to the mortgagee not in possession of the note and mortgage, is not binding upon an assignee thereof who has possession of the note and mortgage at the time of payment, unless he has expressly or impliedly authorized such payment Bale v. Wright, 120 Okla. 174 , 252 P. 56 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.