Estes v. Pickard’s Empirical Analysis
1930
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently July 1961
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Eaves v. Mullen · Tucker v. Leonard · Wolf v. Gills · Powers v. Brown · Pioneer Mortgage Co. v. Carter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We do not find sufficient allegations of fraud, extraneous the record, to support an action such as the present one, which, in effect, is for the purpose of canceling an administrator’s deed and the probate proceedings relating thereto. Ward v. Thompson, 111 Okla. 52 , 237 Pac. 569 ; Cochran v. Barkus, 112 Okla. 180 , 240 Pac. 321 ; McNaughton v. Lewis, 124 Okla. 181 , 254 Pac. 972 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Leflore v. Hansen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.