State v. Korum’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably State v. Mason (2007), State v. Houston-Sconiers (2017)
1 federal appellate · 40 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blakely v. Washington · North Carolina v. Pearce · Bordenkircher v. Hayes · United States v. Lovasco · Blackledge v. Perry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A presumption of vindictiveness arises when a defendant can prove that `all of the circumstances, when taken together, support a realistic likelihood of vindictiveness.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Roy · State v. Gamble“Prosecutorial vindictiveness occurs when `the government acts against a defendant in response to the defendant's prior exercise of constitutional or statutory rights.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Roy“In order to prove the conduct was prejudicial, the defendant must prove there is a substantial likelihood the misconduct affected the jury's verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Ish
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.