Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 P.3d 646 - State v. David

State v. David’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2019
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Blakely v. Washington · 125 Wash. 2d 129 - Carrick v. Locke · State v. McFadden · State v. Bash

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “not inconsistent with the Constitution and statutes of this state.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the judiciary would be acting contrary to the legislature's legitimate, express expectations, as well as failing to fulfill judicial duties, if the courts did not employ long-standing common law definitions to fill in legislative blanks in statutory crimes”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.