Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 PACOMMW 461 - Meredith v. Commonwealth

Meredith v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
December 1992
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 34 Pa. Commw. 310 - Bureau of Traffic Safety v. Lea · 400 Pa. Super. 25 - Commonwealth v. Strunk · Bureau of Traffic Safety v. GROBES. · 138 Pa. Commw. 698 - Tarnopolski v. COM, DEPT. OF TRANSP. · Commonwealthv. Pulleyn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(m) Notwithstanding any other provision in this act, any person, not a registrant, who possesses, sells, delivers, offers for sale, holds for sale or gives away any controlled substance, in addition to any other penalty provided in this or any act, upon conviction for a violation of this act, shall have his or her operating privilege suspended. The clerk of any court of this Commonwealth, within ten days after final judgment of conviction for violations of this act requiring suspension under this section, shall send to the Department of Transportation a record of the conviction on a form provided by the Department of Transportation. When the Department of Transporta tion suspends the operating privilege of a person under this subsection, the duration of the suspension shall be as follows: (1) For a first offense, a period of 90 days from the date of suspension. (2) For a second offense, a period of one year from the date of suspension. (3) For a third offense, and any offense thereafter, a period of two years from the date of suspension. Any multiple suspensions imposed shall be served consecutively.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.