Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 So. 2d 606 - Harper v. State

141 So. 2d 606 - Harper v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 1990
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1990

7 state decisions

301962197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cross v. State · Hamilton v. State · Groover v. State · 30 Ala. App. 27 - Brown v. State · Green v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While a statement, or an admission, such as the one set out here, is insufficient standing alone to establish the corpus delicti of the offense, it may be considered along with the other evidence. Williams v. State, Fla.App. 1960, 117 So.2d 548 ; and Cross v. State, 1928, 96 Fla. 768 , 119 So. 380 . It is likewise settled in this jurisdiction that the corpus delicti may be established by circumstantial evidence. Shuler v. State, Fla. 1961, 132 So.2d 7 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The Defendant is charged with more than one count of theft. Therefore, if you find the defendant guilty of theft, you must determine by your verdict whether: (a.) the acts of the Defendant constituted a series of acts evolving from a single preconceived purpose evidencing a single impulse or (b.) the acts of the Defendant constituted separate and distinct thefts as defined herein.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.