Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 So. 2d 819 - Dade County v. Keyes

141 So. 2d 819 - Dade County v. Keyes’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently September 2008

10 state decisions

4019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 137 So. 2d 828 - Cramp v. BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF ORANGE · Kass v. Lewin · Ex Parte Smith · 85 So. 2d 124 - State Ex Rel. Limpus v. Newell · Louis K. Liggett Co. v. Lee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule is well established that the unconstitutionality of a portion of a statute will not necessarily condemn the entire act. When a part of a statute is de- dared unconstitutional the remainder of the act will be permitted to stand provided: (1) the unconstitutional provisions can be separated from the remaining valid provisions, (2) the legislative purpose expressed in the valid provisions can be accomplished independently of those which are void, (3) the good and the bad features are not so inseparable in substance that it can be said that the Legislature would have passed the one without the other and, (4) an act complete in itself remains after the invalid provisions are stricken”.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “When a portion of a statute or ordinance is declared invalid the remaining portions thereof which are severable ordinarily should be recognized as valid, and it is the duty of the court to preserye their validity whether or not a severability clause was included.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.