Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 SO3D 421 - Stokes v. State

Stokes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Giglio v. United States · Berger v. United States · United States v. Frady · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · Mooney v. Holohan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Typically, this type of prohibited statement occurs when a prosecutor attempts to vouch for or bolster a State witness by commenting in closing argument that the witness was telling the truth.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Except to the extent the prosecutor bases any opinion on the evidence in the case, he may not express his personal opinion on the merits of the case or the credibility of witnesses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A review under the plain error doctrine is necessary when a party's fundamental rights are affected, and the error results in a manifest miscarriage of justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.