Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

141 So. 3d 574

Jones v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2014-03-19

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2018

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-03-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

VILLANTI, Judge.

¶1The postconviction court’s order of March 19, 2012, denying Glen T. Jones, Jr.’s motion for postconviction relief is affirmed. However, we note that Jones filed a “Motion for Leave to Amend and/or Supplement Defendant’s Motion for Post-Conviction Relief’ on December 6, 2011, and another “Motion for Leave to Amend and/or Supplement Defendant’s Motion for Post-Conviction Relief’ on March 15, 2012. Nothing in the record available to this court shows that the postconviction court ever ruled on either of these two motions. Therefore, on remand, the postconviction court should address these two pending motions.

¶2Affirmed and remanded with instructions.

KELLY and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
/141/so3d/574 · .json · Public domain