Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 So. 3d 764 - Rush v. Burdge

141 So. 3d 764 - Rush v. Burdge’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · 443 So. 2d 944 - Mercer v. Raine · 970 So. 2d 312 - McDuffie v. State · 826 So. 2d 221 - Moakley v. Smallwood · 879 So. 2d 3 - Kuttas v. Ritter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Accordingly,- we conclude that the trial court’s exercise of the inherent authority to assess attorneys’ fees against an attorney must be based upon an express finding of bad faith conduct and must be supported by detailed factual findings describing the specific acts of bad faith conduct that resulted in the unnecessary incurrence of attorneys’ fees. -Thus, a finding of bad faith conduct must be predicated on a high degree of specificity in the factual findings, In addition, the amount of the award of attorneys’ fees must be directly related to the attorneys’ fees and costs that the opposing party has incurred as a result of the specific bad faith conduct of the attorney. Moreover, such a sanction is appropriate only after notice and an opportunity to be heard-including the opportunity to present witnesses and other evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.