Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 SW2D 412 - Cox v. Shannon

Cox v. Shannon’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1958
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wichita Falls & Oklahoma Railway Co. v. Pepper · Sun Oil Co. v. Bennett · Marshall v. San Jacinto Bldg., Inc. · Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Howell · Eldridge v. Poirier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * where a suit is for reformation there must be a finding upon evidence that is `clear, exact, and satisfactory' that the mistake of fact was mutual; also, as stated in the same case, that the party seeking reformation must prove by such evidence not only `what the true agreement was,' but `must go further and establish the fact that the terms or provisions of the writing which differ from the true agreement made were placed in the instrument by mutual mistake.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.