Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 TEX 189 - Akers v. Epperson

Akers v. Epperson’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
2
states following
June 1983
most recently cited

93 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently June 1983 · most notably Texas Employers' Insurance v. McCaslin (1958), Crawford v. Detering Co. (1951)

93 state decisions

28019431950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hobrecht v. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is well settled that cases must be tried in the court room and that a juror is not permitted to become a witness during the jury’s deliberations and that it is misconduct for original evidence of material facts to be received by the jury during its deliberations. Hobrecht v. [San Antonio] & A. P. Ry. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 141 S.W. 579 ; Lincoln v. Stone, Tex.Com. App., 59 S.W.2d 100 . Litigants’ rights are not permitted to be thus jeopardized.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““* * * If it be granted that the finding in question was based upon illogical reasons, or that erroneous conclusions were drawn from the evidence, that, without more, would not constitute misconduct. In the absence of overt acts of misconduct it is not permissible to ‘probe the minds of jurors or supervise their process of reasoning’. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.