Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 Tex. 550 - Walker v. Cleere

Walker v. Cleere’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

98
cited by 98 later decisions
1
states following
May 1991
most recently cited

98 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions — most recently May 1991 · most notably TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. Carp (1961), Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Carp (1961)

98 state decisions

240194319501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baumberger v. Allen · Magouirk v. Williams · Dallas County Arcadia Fresh Water Supply Dist. No. 1 v. Pruitt · Dodson v. Ingram · I. Stephenson v. Black Bros.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) Filing an appeal or supersedeas bond within twenty days after rendition of the order appealed from, conditioned as required by the rules governing appeals generally; and “(b) Filing the record in the appellate court within twenty days after rendition of the order appealed from. Provided, that upon the filing of a motion in the appellate court within such twenty-day period,' or within five days thereafter, showing good cause therefor, such court may grant a reasonable extensión of time, in which to file such record or any part thereof.””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““We hold that the filing of the record in the Court of Civil Appeals within' the time fixed by Rule 385 is jurisdictional, and that compliance therewith was not waived by the failure to file a motion to dismiss or strike the record within thirty days after the 'filing thereof.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Rule 404. Motions Relating to In-formalities in Record All motions relating to informalities in the manner of bringing a case into court shall be filed and entered by the clerk on the motion docket within thirty days after the filing of the transcript in the Court of Civil Appeals, otherwise the objection shall be considered as waived, if it can be waived by the party. Rule 405. Motions to Dismiss for Want of Jurisdiction Motions to dismiss for want of jurisdiction to try the case and for such defects as defeat the jurisdiction in the particular case and cannot be waived shall also be made, filed and docketed at said time; provided, however, if made afterwards they may be entertained by the court upon such terms as the court may deem just and proper.’’”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.