Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 WASH2D 201 - Tunstall v. Bergeson

Tunstall v. Bergeson’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
3
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

48 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Nicholas v. United States · Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin v. New York · 90 Wash. 2d 476 - Seattle School District No. 1 v. State · 97 Wash. 2d 385 - Tommy P. v. Board of County Commissioners · Newman v. Schlarb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “ample provision for the education of all children residing within its borders.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. SCHOOL DISTRICTS'ALLIANCE FOR ADEQUATE FUNDING OF SPECIAL EDUC. v. State
  2. “without distinction or preference on account of race, color, caste, or sex.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Porter v. Seattle School Dist. No. 1
  3. “provide for a general and uniform system of public schools.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Federal Way School Dist. No. 210 v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.