141 Wash. 2d 798 - State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
40
cited by 40 later decisions
4
states following
September 2011
most recently cited
40 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Bruton v. United States · Ohio v. Roberts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n criminal prosecutions the accused shall have the right . . . to have a speedy public trial by an impartial jury of the county in which the offense is charged to have been committed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davis · State v. Nunez“`prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davis · State v. Yates“`so flagrant and ill intentioned that it evinces an enduring and resulting prejudice'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Warren · State v. Trout
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.