Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 WIS 228 - Comstock v. Buckley

Comstock v. Buckley’s Empirical Analysis

1910

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1936
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Spies v. . National City Bank · Marling v. Jones · Andrews v. Robertson · Williams v. Gerber · Webber v. Quaw

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The question whether Herman acted fraudulently in negotiating the note to Wight was involved in conflict of evidence either received or offered and much uncertainty of inference from such evidence and should have been passed on by the jury; as also the question whether his payment to Wight was an attempted purchase by him individually or payment of the note on behalf of his principal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.