Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 141 W. Va. 130 - Cochran v. Trussler

141 W. Va. 130 - Cochran v. Trussler’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
December 1984
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently December 1984

7 state decisions

401955196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 116 W. Va. 435 - Neal v. Board of Education · 125 W. Va. 406 - Rowan v. Board of Education · 117 W. Va. 114 - White v. Board of Education of Lincoln County · 113 W. Va. 478 - Jarrett v. Goodall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when administrative inaction has precisely the same impact on the rights of the parties as denial of relief, an agency cannot preclude judicial review by casting its decision in the form of inaction rather than in the form of an order denying relief.” 10 .It is well settled in this jurisdiction that "A peremptory writ of mandamus will issue to require the discharge by a public official of a non-discretionary duty.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Hither-to, it has been the practice and usage by this Court to accurately designate statutes as Acts of the Legislature when such statutes have been enacted after the adoption of the 1931 Code, which is the only official Code of the State of West Virginia. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The Bench and the Bar of this State are entitled to accurate citations of the authorities cited in an opinion. By such accuracy, chaos and confusion have been avoided. Otherwise, a careless citation of such authorities results in confusion. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.