¶1Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with costs, but without prejudice to any application that the respondent may be advised to make for amendment of the order whereby the commissioners were appointed. (See Matter of Bley v. Village of Hamburg, 84 App. Div. 23.) Jenks, Burr, Thomas, Rich and Carr, JJ., concurred.
142 A.D. 904
In re Haring
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 15, 1910
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1910-12-15
Decided 1910-12-15