¶1— We think that the plaintiffs-are entitled to recover so much of the interest on the first mortgage, and also so much of the taxes paid by them as accrued prior to the date when defendant notified plaintiffs that he would not take title because .of defects in the proceedings to foreclose the second mortgage. Order overruling demurrer affirmed, with costs. Hirschberg; P. J., Woodward, Burr, Rich and Carr, JJ., concurred.
142 A.D. 906
Levine v. Herrscher
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 15, 1910
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1910-12-15
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 2000
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1910-12-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →