¶1Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Although the court erred in finding that no extraordinary circumstances existed which would warrant consideration of the best interests of the children (see, Matter of Michael Paul T. v Thomas R., 124 AD2d 970), it nevertheless properly found that the best interests of the children would be served by awarding custody to the father. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Sedita, J.—custody.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ.
142 A.D.2d 996
Fox v. Feltz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 7, 1988
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1988-07-07
Decided 1988-07-07