People v. Perez’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“from the inception of his encounter with the police, defendant's conduct was consistent with his constitutional right to avoid contact ** with the police”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Perez“detention and frisk of defendant by grabbing his wrists, pulling up his sleeves, and removing a weapon from his body was not justified”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Perez“Can you hold the door, police, hold the door?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Perez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.