Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

142 Ala. 112

State v. Stallings

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1904

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1904-11-15

Tried before the Hon. W. L. Parks. This was a petition filed in the chancery court of Butler county by J. F. Stallings, in behalf of Dan alias Daniel Stallings, as follows: “Your petitioner, J. F. Stallings, most respectfully represent unto your honor that Dan alias Daniel Stallings, in whose behalf this application or petition is made, is illegally imprisoned, and restrained of his libetry and held under guard in the Elk Hotel, in the city of Greenville, Alabama, by one J.…

Relies on Fonville v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1904-11-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently September 1956

7 state decisions

30190419101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

ANDERSON, J.

¶1Upon the hearing of this petition before the'chancellor, the State offered to prove by witnesses that after defendant, who was seriously wounded, had been removed to Peagler’s drug store, and about five minutes áfter the shooting, upon being informed that Buckhaults was dead, said, “I have done what I have always intended to do, and am ready to die.” This'evidence was objected to by defendant, and the objection was sustained by the chancellor.

¶2“Acts and declarations to be admissible as res gestae must be substantially contemporaneous with the main fact and so closely connected with it as to illustrate its character.” Fonville v. State, 91 Ala. 39; Mayfield’s Digest, Vol. 1, p. 772. We do not think this evidence was admissible as a part of the res gestae.

¶3There Avas no predicate for the introduction thereof as a confession. All confessions are prima facie not admissible .as evidence. — Mayfield’s Digest, Vol. 1, p. 206. The action of the chancellor in excluding this evidence was proper.

¶4The order of the chancellor granting the petitioner bail is affirmed.

McClellan, C.J., Tyson and Simpson, J.J., concurring. "
/142/ala/112 · .json · Public domain