Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 ALA 43 - Kendrick v. State

Kendrick v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1904

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
January 1928
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 1928

8 state decisions

40190419101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Tilghman v. Proctor · Williams v. Fears · Ex parte Sikes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under our statutes, all occupation taxes are evidenced by a receipt which is called a license, so that we do not think that the fact that this is spoken of in the act, as a license, renders the act any the less a tax on the occupation for revenue.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.