Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 Ariz. 260 - State v. Bolt

State v. Bolt’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

115
cited by 115 later decisions
9
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

115 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 115 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably State v. Davolt (2004), State v. Ault (1986)

115 state decisions

40019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 242 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Illinois v. Gates · Wong Sun v. United States · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · United States v. Leon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 115 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E)ven though on occasion we may not agree with the parameters of the exclusionary rule as defined by the United States Supreme Court, we propose so long as possible, to keep the Arizona exelusion-ary rule uniform with the federal.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “No person shall be disturbed in his private affairs, or his home invaded, without authority of law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “one of the few things worse than a single exclusionary rule is two different exclusionary rules.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.