Thomas v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably Swichtenberg v. Brimer (1991), In Re Marriage of Pownall (2000)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc. · Neal v. Neal · Lindsay v. Lindsay · Rossi v. Stewart · Cockrill v. Cockrill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“dissipat[e] it to an extent that when she no longer had any earning capacity , there would be nothing left upon which she could draw.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Cotter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.