Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 Ariz. 415 - Young v. Burkholder

Young v. Burkholder’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently May 2023

12 state decisions

7019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 42 Cal. 2d 55 - Flynn v. Flynn · Polk v. Koerner · McNelis v. Bruce · Simpson v. Superior Court · Ruhsam v. Ruhsam

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the court finds that the separation agreement is not unfair as to disposition of property maintenance, and that it is reasonable as to support, custody and visitation of children, the separation agreement shall be set forth or incorporated by reference in the decree of dissolution ... and the parties shall be ordered to perform them. If the separation agreement provides that its terms shall not be set forth in the decree, the decree shall identify the separation agreement as incorporated by reference and state that the court has found the terms as to property disposition and maintenance not unfair and the terms as to support, custody and visitation of children reasonable.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “if there is language in a post-nuptial agreement from which it is clear that a merger with the divorce judgment is not intended, the purpose of the incorporation by the court- into the judgment will be only to identify the agreement so as to render its validity res judicata in any subsequent action).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.