Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 Ariz. 454 - State v. Tison

State v. Tison’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2018

4 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

1001984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Enmund v. Florida · Whitten v. United States · State v. Gretzler · State v. Dessureault · McClain v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]ntend [sic] to kill includes the situation in which the defendant intended, contemplated, or anticipated that lethal force would or might be used or that life would or might be taken in accomplishing the underlying felony.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[E]ven if petitioner's claim were not precluded, it would not warrant relief.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “From these facts we conclude that petitioner intended to kill. Petitioner's participation up to the moment of the firing of the fatal shots was substantially the same as that of Gary Tison and Greenawalt. . . . Petitioner, actively participated in the events leading to death by, inter alia, providing the murder weapons and helping abduct the victims. Also petitioner was present at the murder site, did nothing to interfere with the murders, and after the murders even continued on the joint venture. 25”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.