Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 BR 327 - In Re Parker

In Re Parker’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
June 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2017

2 federal appellate · 3 district ·

50199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 521 · 11 U.S.C. § 524 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 722 · 28 U.S.C. § 157

Relies on Bell General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Bell · In the Matter of Judy Emely Edwards, Also Known as Judy Emely Glass, Debtor-Appellant · Lowry Federal Credit Union v. West · Belanger Home Owners Funding Corporation of America v. Belanger · In Re White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n this common scenario, none of the three so-called mandatory alternatives listed in [§ 521(2)(A) ] have occurred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a coalition of bankers, credit unions, finance companies, oil companies and retailers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.