In Re Petrie’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 28 U.S.C. § 1408 · 28 U.S.C. § 1412
Relies on Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co. · Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co. · Council of & for the Blind of Delaware County Valley, Inc. v. Regan · Oaks of Woodlake Phase III, Ltd. v. Hall, Bayoutree Associates, Ltd. · Sdc Development Corporation v. F. David Mathews, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If a petition is filed in an improper district, on timely motion of a party in interest and after hearing on notice to the petitioners, the United States trustee, and other entities as directed by the court, the case may be dismissed or transferred to any other district if the court determines that transfer is in the interest of justice or for the convenience of the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re McCall“(a) The district court of a district in which is filed a case laying venue in the wrong division or district shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.