In Re Husted’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2013
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1323 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 1328 · 11 U.S.C. § 523
Relies on Leser Jj Mickelson v. J Leser K · 18 477 72162 Chaffin Chaffin · In Re Kovich · In Re Lawson · Matter of Curtis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1. Whether there is a rational basis for the classification; 2. Whether the classification is necessary to the debtor’s rehabilitation under chapter 13; 3. Whether the discriminatory classification is proposed in good faith; 4. Whether there is a meaningful payment to the class discriminated against;.... 5. The difference between what the creditors discriminated against will receive as the plan is proposed, and the amount they would receive if there was no separate classification.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Kolbe
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.