In Re Claypool’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2017
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 109
Relies on Comprehensive Accounting Corp. v. Pearson · Sylvester v. Dow Jones & Co. (In Re Sylvester) · In Re Lambert · Craig Corp. v. Albano (In Re Albano) · In Re Pulliam
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[o]nly an individual with regular income that owes, on the date of the filing of the petition, noncontingent, liquidated, unsecured debts of less than [$394,725] 5 .., may be a debtor under chapter 13 of this title.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Green
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.