Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 Cal. App. 2d 404 - People v. Tillman

142 Cal. App. 2d 404 - People v. Tillman’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
June 1965
most recently cited

27 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 21 Cal. 2d 690 - People v. Huston · People v. Schwartz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ [6] ' [T]he defense of entrapment is a positive defense imposing upon an accused the burden of showing that he was induced to commit the act for which he is on trial (citation). [7] To invoke the defense it must necessarily be assumed that the act charged as a public offense was committed’ (People v. Schwartz, 109 Cal.App.2d 450, 455 [ 240 P.2d 1024 ]).” (See also People v. Spencer, 193 Cal.App.2d 13, 18 [ 13 Cal.Rptr. 881 ] ; People v. Schwartz, 109 Cal.App.2d 450, 455 [ 240 P.2d 1024 ].)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.