Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 CONN 113 - State v. Malm

State v. Malm’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 1995
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1995 · most notably Rogers v. Richmond (1961), State v. Ross (1994)

24 state decisions

10019551960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Smith · State v. Chapman · State v. Donahue · State v. Tomassi · State v. Simborski

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The question is whether the court could reasonably conclude that there was sufficient time to enable the mind of the defendant to conceive a wilful, deliberate, premeditated intent to kill before the act was done.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.