Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 142 CONNAPP 641 - Gianetti v. Rutkin

Gianetti v. Rutkin’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sanzone v. Board of Police Commissioners · State v. Courchesne · Ancona v. Manafort Bros. · Reinke v. Greenwich Hospital Assn. · Butler v. Solomon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Section 20-7f addresses balance billing. Typically, [b]alance billing [occurs] when a provider seeks to collect from [a managed care organization] member the difference between the provider's billed charges for a service and the amount the [managed care organization] paid on that claim.... [M]ost privately insured people are covered by [a managed care organization], which contracts with a network of providers to offer medical services to members. In return, providers agree to deliver services at a negotiated rate that is generally below their usual charges. Providers also agree to hold harmless (i.e., not to balance bill) members for the difference between the contracted rate and their typical billed charge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.