In re Jordan’s Empirical Analysis
142 F. 292 · 1905
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 1936
1 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re Seaholm · In re Little · In re Neely · In re Carleton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The judge shall * * * discharge the applicant unless he has in voluntary proceedings been granted a discharge in bankruptcy within six years.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Haase
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.