Love v. Busch’s Empirical Analysis
142 F. 429 · 1906
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Edmund Smiley v. State of Kansas · Huguley Manufacturing Company v. Galeton Cotton Mills · Filhiol v. Maurice · State v. Charlotte Harbor Phosphate Co. · 47 Tex. Crim. 283 - Ex Parte Keith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In either case our rules have not been complied with; but we notice that the appellees have duly appeared, and that no injury has resulted from the noncoinpliance with the rules, and as they are directory, and not juris-' dictional, we are doubtful as to the justice of applying any penalty, and particularly such a harsh penalty as would be the dismissal of the appeal.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.